JAWAHAR LAL Vs. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KANPUR DEHAT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SUDHIR Narain, J. Petitioners Nos. 1 to 5 claim that they are working as Seasonal Collection Peons since the years 1981, 1988, 1982, 1986 and 1982 respectively in Thasil Bilhaur, district Kanpur Dehat. They seek a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to appoint them to the post of perma nent Collection Peons.

(2.) THE Seasonal Collection Peons are normally attached with Seasonal Collection Amins for realisation of Government dues. THEy are normally appointed during the seasons when the collection of Government dues are made. THE work of Seasonal Collection Peon is not of permanent nature, THEir appointments are made due to exigencies of work

(3.) IN Rajesh Kumar Khare and another y. ]state of U. P. and others, 1993 (1) UPLBEC 729, where Seasonal Collection Amins claimed regularisation of their services, this Court took the view that their appointments are made for few months and they cannot claim regularisation. It was, however, directed that if any post of Collection Amin was vacant the cases of the petitioners may be considered for appointments in accordance with Rules. Seasonal Collection Peons are normally attached to Seasonal Collection Amins. A Seasonal Collection Peon cannot claim a better right than a Seasonal Collec tion Amin.