SUMRATIYA Vs. COMMISSIONER MORADABAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. P. Srivastava, J. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Perused the record.

(2.) THE petitioners feel aggrieved by an order passed in the proceedings under Section 122-C (6) of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition And Land Reforms Act, 1950 whereunder the Upper Ziladhikari (Prashasan) has upheld the allot ments made in the proceedings under Section 122-C (1) of the said Act which had been approved by the competent authority vide its order dated 2-6-1995.

(3.) IT may be noticed that the order passed by the Additional Collector dated 8. 9. 1995 was challenged by the petitioners by means of a revision under Section 333 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act. The Ad ditional Commissioner vide his order dated, 12. 9. 1995 had, however, dismissed the aforesaid revision on the ground that it was not maintainable in view of the prohibition contained in section 122-C (7) of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act.