M C VERMA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the Learned Counsel for the parties,

(2.) THIS revision arises out of the order dated 6 -8 -1983, passed by Sri R. C. Agarwal, District Judge, Bijnor, allowing the objections raised on behalf of the State that the execution moved in the court of District Judge on the basis of a certificate issued by the U.P. Public Services (Tribunal) under Section 5(7) of the U.P. Public Services (Tribunal) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is not maintainable.

(3.) THE Learned Counsel for the revisionist has fairly conceded that the order passed by the Tribunal was in the nature of the declaration under Section 5(6) of the Act. It so appears that the directions of the Tribunal were not complied with by the Superintendent of police, Pilibhit and so the revisionist applied for the certificate under Section 5(7) of the Act and moved the District Judge for execution of the certificate as a decree. Objections were filed on behalf of the State. The District Judge has been pleased to allow it and hence this revision.