(1.) WE are not satisfied that there is any merit in the Petitioner's submission that before issuing a notice Under Section 6 of the Uttar Pradesh High Schools and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and other Employees) Act, 1971, requiring the Petitioner to show cause why it should not be suspended, it was obligatory upon the Deputy Director of Education to call upon the Petitioner to comply with the certain directions issued by him. Section 6(2) which runs thus:
(2.) LEARNED Counsel for the Petitioner has also contended that in the circumstances of the case the order passed by the Deputy Director was not appropriate. We are not inclined to go into this aspect of the case. The Act provides an appeal against the impugned order and there is no reason why Petitioner should not, for questioning the propriety of the order, must avail of the remedy provided in the Act itself.