CHANDRADHAN SINGH Vs. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY VARANASI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN this and in the connected writ petitions a common question arises on similar facts and hence they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

(2.) IN this writ petition there are four petitioners. The facts of the cases of petitioners Nos. 1 and 2 Chandradhan Singh and Bhagwati Prasad are identical while the facts of the cases of the remaining two petitioners Vinod Kumar Goel and Sobbnath Singh are slightly different. The petitioners Nos. 1 and 2 shall hereinafter be referred to as the petitioners first set and the petitioners Nos. 3 and 4 shall be referred to as the petitioners second set.

(3.) NOW it is not disputed that temporary permits had been granted to the petitioners. This is clear from the letter of the R. T. A. dated 9th July, 1975 issued to the petitioner No. 1 Chandra Dhan Singh, which is in the following words:-