LAWS(ALL)-1975-7-35

LAKSHMI BRAHMAN Vs. STATE

Decided On July 10, 1975
LAKSHMI BRAHMAN Appellant
V/S
STATE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is an application under Section 439, Criminal P. C. by Lakshmi Brahman and Nawal Garg. The applicants pray that they may be directed to be released on bail. Since the case involved the interpretation of Section 167 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the learned single Judge thought that there was a conflict of judicial opinion in that regard, be referred the case to a Division Bench. This is bow the case has come up before us.

(2.) THE two applicants Lakshmi Brahman and Nawal Garg were accused in a case under Section 302, I. P. C. They surrendered themselves before a Magistrate on 2nd November, 1974 and were taken into custody on the same day. However, the police failed to submit a charge-sheet against them, within 60 days of their arrest (the charge-sheet had not been submitted even upto 5th February, 1975 ). The applicants, therefore, moved the present application and claimed that once the police failed to submit a charge-sheet within a period of 60 days of the arrest, their detention thereafter became illegal and they were entitled to be released on bail as provided in Section 167 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. In their application, the applicants further alleged that their request for being released on. bail had already been rejected by the Sessions Judge, but they did not make it clear whether their request was made and rejected before or after the expiry of 60 days of their arrest

(3.) WHEN the case came up for hearing before us, learned Counsel appearing for the State admitted that in this case the police did not submit the charge-sheet against the applicants within 60 days of 2-111974 (the date on which the two applicants were taken into custody ). He also informed us that subsequently the charge-sheet has been submitted and the Magistrate has already taken cognizance of the offence. However, by the time this application came up for hearing before us, the learned Magistrate, could not, due to certain unavoidable reasons, make an Older committing the applicants to the Court of Session. He contended that once the charge-sheet has been submitted and cognizance of the offence taken, Section 167 (2) of the Code ceased to apply and in such circumstances an accused could not claim to be released on bail as of right His prayer for bail had to be considered in accordance with the provisions of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.