REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

JAGJIT SINGH Appellant

V/S

DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KANPUR Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

FLOWER V. LLOYD [REFERRED TO]
HUTH V. CLARKS [REFERRED TO]
GORDON,DADDS AND CO. V.MORRIS [REFERRED TO]
LEWISHAM METROPOLITAN BOROUGH AND TOWN CLERK V. ROBERTS [REFERRED TO]
MANTON V. BRIGHTON CORPORATION [REFERRED TO]
R N SETH VS. GIRJA SHANKER SRIVASTAVA [REFERRED TO]
C D HANS VS. MUNNU LAL [REFERRED TO]
MANNU LAL VS. CHAKRADHAR HANS [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL HAMID VS. FATIMA BEGUM [REFERRED TO]
MAHABIR PRASAD VS. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KANPUR [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) I agree, but as we are differing from Bhargava J. I desire to state briefly my reasons for so doing.

(2.) The two important questions in this case are, firstly, whether the proviso which appears at the foot of Sub-section (1) of Section 7-A is limited in its application to that sub-section, and, secondly, whether the Rent Control and Eviction Officer could by his order dated 22-12-1952, revoke his earlier order of the 6-11-1952.

(3.) The proviso is in these terms:

Click here to view full judgment.

JAGJIT SINGH Vs. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KANPUR

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address