(1.) Heard Shri Bhoop Chandra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the State/opposite party Nos. 1 to 4 as well as Shri Anil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the private opposite parties and perused the record.
(2.) By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought the following main relief :
(3.) Assailing the impugned orders, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner stated that the impugned order is liable to be interfered with by this Court, as the same has been passed without considering the genuine grievance of the petitioner as also that the same is against the principles embodied under Sec. 19 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (in short "Act of 1953").