(1.) Petitioners in present bunch of matters have applied on different posts in pursuance of a recruitment process initiated on basis of Adv. No. 2/2013-14 issued by respondent-University.
(2.) Petitioners have claimed that after going through process of shortlisting, objective and subjective written examination, they were qualified and called for interview and Selection Committee conducted interview of petitioners also.
(3.) It is further case of petitioners that recruitment process was stalled on the basis of a communication between the State and University and a decision was taken not to continue with recruitment process.