(1.) Heard Mr. Shriprakash Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shashi Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2&3 and Mr. Shailendra Singh, learned counsel for the State-respondent.
(2.) The instant writ petition has been preferred, inter alia, challenging the order dtd. 6/10/2022, passed by Respondent No. 2, whereby the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Assistant Teacher has been rendered null and void, and a consequential direction for recovery of the salary paid has also been issued.
(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner has made the following contentions:-