LAWS(ALL)-2015-4-150

SURESH CHANDRA Vs. RADHEY SHYAM AGRAWAL

Decided On April 15, 2015
SURESH CHANDRA Appellant
V/S
Radhey Shyam Agrawal Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Both these writ petitions have arisen from proceedings involving common premises and parties, therefore, have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.

(2.) Sri Ajit Kumar, Advocate, has advanced arguments on behalf of petitioner and Sri Arvind Srivastava, Advocate, has made his submissions on behalf of contesting respondents. Besides, Sri Arvind Srivastava has also filed written arguments.

(3.) Both these writ petitions have come up under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India at the instance of a tenant who is occupying a non residential accommodation, i.e., Shop No. 88/2 Sarafa Bazar, Jhansi, owned by plaintiff-respondent no. 1, Sri Radhey Shyam Agrawal (hereinafter referred to as " the landlord").