SUNIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY means of this writ petition the petitioner has come to this Court with the grievance that his claim for appointment under the dying in harness provision is not being considered.

(2.) THE petitioner's mother was a Class -IV employee in the intermediate college.

(3.) IT is submitted that she was a permanent employee. Unfortunately she died on 27.4.1996. At the time of her death the petitioner was minor and, therefore, he could not apply. He attained majority in 2009 and thereafter he applied on 30.10.2009. The matter was referred to the Additional Director (Secondary Education), U.P. which has rejected the application.