ABHISHEK @ BADKAU GUPTA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Rajiv Lochan Shukla and Sri Shiv Kant Awasthi, learned counsel for the applicant, and Sri Ripusudan Yadav, learned AGA appearing for the State and perused the record.

(2.) It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the owner of the factory from where the articles in question were recovered. The four other co-accused, who are the labrourer of the factory have already been granted bail by the competent court. He submitted that applicant was forcibly taken away from his house. The applicant is doing business of wholesale general merchant of goods. The allegation levelled against the applicant is false, frivolous and baseless. The applicant has no criminal history. The applicant is languishing in jail since 16.06.2015.

(3.) Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute with the aforesaid facts.