SUKHIA Vs. D D C

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Shrinath Dwivedi learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. V.K. Rai for the contesting respondent.

(2.) THIS petition arises out of proceedings for allotment of chaks under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act and is directed against the revisional order dated 31.01.1983. The petitioner is chak holder no. 300 while the respondent no. 2 is holder of chak no. 18.

(3.) IT has been submitted by Sri Dwivedi learned counsel for the petitioner that aggrieved by the chaks proposed by the Assistant Consolidation Officer the petitioner preferred an objection which was allowed. Against this order no appeal was filed by the respondent. Certain other appeals arising out of separate and different objections were filed and by the order passed by the Settlement Officer Consolidation whereby a number of appeals were heard and decided together affecting the chak of Jawahar Lal, respondent no. 2. Aggrieved by this order, Jawahar Lal preferred a revision on the ground that the first chak proposed to him on Plot nos. 1066. 1067 and 1068 be shifted on Plot nos. 1048, 1055 and 1056. This revision has been allowed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation. Hence, this writ petition. When this petition came up for hearing on an earlier occasion the following order was passed on 15.05.2006: -