REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

CHETAN DAS Appellant

V/S

D C S C Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

STATE OF PUNJAB VS. MANOHAR SINGH PRATAP SINGH [REFERRED TO]
BOMBAY SALT AND CHEMICAL INDU STRIES VS. L J JOHNSON [REFERRED TO]
RAYALA CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED VS. DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT NEW DELHI [REFERRED TO]
MITHOO SHAHANI MITHOO SHAHANI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
BISHAN PAUL VS. MOTHU RAM [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF GUJARAT VS. PATIL RAGHAV NATHA [REFERRED TO]
SURINDER SINGH VS. CENTRAL GOVERNMENT [REFERRED TO]
BHARGAVA AND COMPANY VS. SHYAM SUNDER SETH [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMAD KAVI MOHAMAD AMIN VS. FATMABAI IBRAHIM [REFERRED TO]
KOLHAPUR CANESUGAR WORKS LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF PUNJAB VS. HARNEK SINGH [REFERRED TO]
GENERAL FINANCE COMPANY VS. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
SHANKARA CO OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD VS. M PRABHAKAR [REFERRED TO]
M C RAHBAR VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
PARTUMAL VS. MANAGING OFFICER [REFERRED TO]
INDRAPAL SINGH VS. STATE OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]
JAIMAL SINGH S/O JAWAHAR SINGH AND ANR. VS. SMT. GINI DEVI [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present writ petition is directed against the order dated 10th January, 1995, passed by Deputy Chief Settlement Commissioner, U.P.-cum-Member, Board of Revenue, U.P. at Lucknow, as well as its subsequent order dated 6th April, 1995, rejecting the restoration application of the petitioner.

(2.) The order impugned dated 10.1.1995 has been passed, allowing revision filed under Section 24 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954, whereby sale certificate dated 14.6.1968, issued in favour of four persons, including the petitioner, has been cancelled, and a direction has been issued to issue a fresh sale certificate in favour of deceased Tota Mal, for the reason that he alone was the auction purchaser. The order dated 10.1.1995 is reproduced:-

(3.) A restoration application was filed by the petitioner alleging that the order dated 10.1.1995 was passed upon a revision, which itself was highly belated, as it was filed after 23 years, and without there being any order for condonation of delay, the same was allowed ex-parte, by a cryptic order, without hearing the petitioner. Various other grounds were pressed for restoration of the proceedings.

Click here to view full judgment.

CHETAN DAS Vs. D C S C

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address