REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Rambachan Appellant

V/S

DY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION JAUNPUR Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

SHANKAR VS. ADC AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
MUKUT NATH VS. DDC [REFERRED TO]
DAMODAR VS. DDC [REFERRED TO]
LALA SHRI BHAGWAN VS. RAM CHAND [REFERRED TO]
UGAMSINGH AND MISHRIMAL VS. KESRIMAL [REFERRED TO]
SHADI LAL GUPTA VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. DISTRICT JUDGE UNNAO [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD SWALLEH VS. THIRD ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE MEERUT [REFERRED TO]
A R ANTULAY VS. R S NAYAK [REFERRED TO]
PUNJAB LAND DEVELOPMENT AND RECLAMATION CORPORATION LIMITED CHANDIGARH DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AMRAVATI REGIONAL MANAGER WEST ZONE NOW KNOWN AS KANPUR REGION BANK OF BARODA REGIONAL OFFICE LUCKNOW VS. PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT CHANDIGARH:CHANDRASHEKHAR MARIBHAU DESHMUKH :SECRETARY U P BANK EMPLOYEES UNION C O BANK OF BARODA LATOUCHE ROAD KANPUR :LABOUR COURT RANCHI:NAMDEO:SECRETA [REFERRED TO]
SHEO NAND VS. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION ALLAHABAD [REFERRED TO]
ROSHAN DEEN VS. PREETI LAL [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VS. MAST RAM [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH CHANDRA SANKLA VS. VIKRAM CEMENT [REFERRED TO]
GULJAR SINGH VS. DEPUTY DIRECTOR CONSOLIDATION [REFERRED TO]
V KISHAN RAO VS. NIKHIL SUPER SPECIALITY HOSPITAL [REFERRED TO]
RAMDEO VS. D D C [REFERRED TO]
TIRATH VS. JOINT DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION BASTI [REFERRED TO]
PARAWEZ AHMAD VS. JOINT D C AZAMGARH [REFERRED TO]
AMARJIT SINGH VS. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION JAUNPUR [REFERRED TO]
DINA NATH TIWARI VS. DEPUTY DIRECTOR CONSOLIDATION GORAKHPUR [REFERRED TO]
RAM NARESH(DEAD) VS. D.D.C., AZAMGARH & ORS. [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri S.C. Tripathi, for the petitioner, and Sri D.K. Pandey, for the contesting respondents -2 to 4.

(2.) THE writ petition has been filed against the order of Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 19.11.2014 passed in chak allotment proceeding under U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').

(3.) THE dispute between the parties is for allotment of chak on plot 144 of village Alishahpur, tahsil and district Jaunpur, which is original holding of respondents -2 to 4. The petitioner has filed CH Form -2 -A of plot 144, which shows that settlement area of plot 144 was 0.073 hectare. Out of which an area of 0.043 hectare was agricultural land and its valuation was determined and from the stage of Assistant Consolidation Officer, it was allotted in the chaks of respondents -2 to 4, while an area of 0.020 hectare was found as abadi and by the order of Consolidation Officer, dated 01.08.2013 it was directed to be recorded in the names of respondents -2 to 4. There is no whisper in respect of remaining area of 0.010 hectare, in CH Form -2 -A. Ram Bachan (chak -358) (the petitioner) filed a time barred objection (registered as case No. 100) under Section 20 of the Act, on 28.01.2014, claiming for allotment of plot 144 in his chak by deleting his chak on plots 151, 153 and 154 and shifting the chaks of respondents -2 to 4 on plots 140 and 141. The Consolidation Officer, by order dated 12.02.2014 allowed the objection of the petitioner, condoning delay and allotted plots 144 (area 0.059 hectare) and 146 (area 0.002 hectare) in chak of the petitioner and plots 151, 153 and 154, in the chaks of respondents -2 to 4.

Click here to view full judgment.

RAMBACHAN Vs. DY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION JAUNPUR

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address