GIRJA DEVI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Rajiv Lochan Shukla, learned counsel for the revisionists; Sri Durga Prasad, learned counsel for O.P. No.2; Sri Vimlendu Tripathi, learned A.G.A. and perused the records.

(2.) CONSIDERING the nature of the order that is being passed as also the ground on which it is being passed, I do not consider it necessary to call for a counter affidavit. The learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant are also agreeable for disposal of this revision straightway to avoid further delay in the proceeding.

(3.) THE instant revision has been filed challenging an order dated 17.4.2015, passed by the Judicial Magistrate (Court No.10), Jhansi in Case No.5123/2014, under Section 498 -A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Mahila Thana, Jhansi, whereby an application seeking discharge under Section 239 Cr.P.C. has been rejected and non -bailable warrant issued against the revisionists.