KARTAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) NOTICE on behalf of opposite parties no. 1 and 2 has been accepted by the learned Chief Chief Standing Counsel. Sri Rajnish Kumar, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party no. 3.

(2.) I have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the record.

(3.) BY means of present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus for commanding the opposite parties to incorporate the petitioner's name as per his seniority at appropriate place in the eligibility list drawn for filling up 10% of vacancies of the quota reserved in the Rules 5 (2) (as amended on 4th July, 2003) for consideration for promotion from Group "C" post to the post of junior Engineer (Civil) and consider his candidature as per the provisions of U.P. Irrigation Department Civil Engineer (Subordinate) Service Rules, 1992 as amended Rules 2003 with all admissible consequential benefits.