KRISHNA KUMAR BHARTI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SRI . M.M. Asthana, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.6. Sri Prashant Arora, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.18. Notice on behalf of respondent no.19 has been accepted by Sri Rahul Shukla,learned counsel whereas Sri Jogendra Nath Verma, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent nos.4, 20 to 22 and 24 to 28.

(2.) THE petitioners claim benefit of an interim order dated 20.11.2014 passed in Writ Petition No. 7202 (M/S) of 2014 which is based on an order previously passed by this Court on 13.11.2013 in Writ -A No. 59978 of 2013. The dispute appears to have been set at rest by this Court in Special Appeal (Def) No. 716 of 2014 which has reaffirmed the decision taken by this Court in earlier Special Appeal (Def) No. 680 of 2014. It has been ruled by the Court that a candidate securing 82 marks shall be taken to be possessed of the minimum eligibility of 55% marks so far as reserved category candidates are concerned and this is now generally accepted in respect of the eligibility for TET also.

(3.) THE respondents do not dispute that once the petitioners have obtained 82 marks, they shall be eligible and entitled to participate in the selection process. In this regard government order dated 02.01.2015 has been issued according to which provisional T.E.T certificate shall be the basis of consideration which can be obtained on being applied for before the Board giving particulars of the relevant T.E.T examination. In view of above, benefit of order passed by this Court In similarly circumstanced cases is extended In terms of the order dated 16.02.2015 passed In Writ Petition No. 9334(M/S) of 2014 reproduced hereunder: -