CHANDRA GUPTA Vs. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE COURT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE review -petitioner has sought review of the judgement passed by this Court on 12.3.2013, in Writ Petition No. 125 of 2009 (R/C), whereby the writ petition was dismissed.

(2.) I have heard the learned counsel for the review -petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting opposite parties.

(3.) REVIEW of the judgment has been sought on the ground that this Court while dismissing the writ petition came to a wrong conclusion that the review -petitioner did not raise the plea of notice before the revisional court and in the present writ petition. Another ground for review of the judgment which has been taken is that this Court did not consider the plea of the review petitioner that none of the grounds mentioned in sub -section (2) of Section 20 of Act No. 13 of 1972 exist warranting and justifying the decree of ejectment.