SUSHILA AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal has arisen from a judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 25 August 2015 by which a writ petition filed by the appellants to question the legality of orders passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, SDO Rudauli, district Faizabad on 26 February 2014 and 13 January 2015 has been dismissed. The view of the learned Single Judge is a remedy of a revision would be available under sub-section (4A) of Section 122B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, Act against an order passed under sub-section (4F). Hence, the writ petition was not entertained on the ground of the availability of alternate statutory remedy.

(2.) The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition on the ground that a remedy of a revision was available under Section 122B (4A).

(3.) The Supreme Court has held thus: