BALJIT Vs. D D C

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arjun Singhal for the respondents.

(2.) THE writ petition arises out of an objection under Section 9 -A (2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act and is directed against the revisional order passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation on 10.12.1980.

(3.) THE dispute in the writ petition pertains to Plot no. 418 area 15 Bighas 13 Biswa of Khata no. 235 in the village in question. In the basic year record Khata no. 235 was recorded in the name of Ballu and Murli sons of Sohan.