HARI GOVIND GUPTA Vs. VTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Shri Ashish Srivastava, learned Counsel holding brief of Shri Vipin Sinha and Shri Navin Sinha, learned Counsel for petition/legal representatives of petitioner. In spite of sufficient service neither the landlord/respondent No. 3 nor after his death his legal representatives appeared.

(2.) THIS writ petition arises out of release/eviction proceedings initiated by landlord Girdhar Lalji Goswami, respondent No. 3 since deceased and survived by legal representatives against Har Govind Gupta, tenant -petitioner since deceased and survived by legal representatives under section 21 of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 on the ground of bona fide need in the form of P.A. case No. 108/78. Accommodation in dispute is a house and is situate in Koocha Sitaram, Bareilly. Rate of rent is Rs. 22.50 per month.

(3.) THE main basis of Appellate Court's judgment is the evidence in the form of affidavits of Neelmani Goswami and Yamuna Dart Kandpal. Their affidavits had already been refused to be taken on record.