MOHD NADEEM Vs. HABIB AHMED

JUDGEMENT

(1.) VIKRAM Nath, J. This writ petition has been filed by the defendant challenging the order dated 6-2-2004 passed by the Judge, Small Causes Court and also order dated 30-7-2004 passed by the Additional District Judge, Court No. 6, Bareilly, whereby the amendment application filed by the defendant-petitioner was dismissed and the revision against the same was also dismissed.

(2.) THE facts giving rise to this petition are that Habib Ahmad respondent filed a suit for recovery of arrears of rent and ejectment of the petitioner, which was registered as S. C. C. Suit No. 57 of 2000 Habib Ahmad v. Mohd. Nadeem. THE defendant-petitioner filed written statement and subsequently moved and amendment application (paper No. 48-C) seeking amendment of the written statement. Objections were filed by the plaintiff to the said application, mainly on two grounds firstly, that in the garb of the amendment sought by the defendant he wanted to withdraw an admission made in the written statement and secondly, the amendment was filed at a belated stage after close of plaintiff's evidence. THE trial Court vide order dated 6-2- 2004 after hearing the parties came to the conclusion that the amendment sought by the petitioner was not at all necessary and accordingly rejected the same.

(3.) I have heard Sri Dilip Khare, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Javed Habib, learned Counsel for the respondent.