LAWS(ALL)-2005-9-214

JANARDAN KUMAR Vs. KISHORI LAL

Decided On September 06, 2005
JANARDAN KUMAR Appellant
V/S
KISHORI LAL Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. U. Khan, J. This is landlords writ petition arising out of release proceedings initiated by them against tenant- respondent No. 1 Kishori Lal under Section 21 (1) (b) of U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972. Property in dispute is a shop. In the release application it was stated that building was in a dilapidated condition. Release application was registered as Case No. 21 of 1984. Prescribed Authority Chandausi, rejected the release application on 18-4-1985. Landlords filed R. C. Appeal No. 30 of 1985 against the judgment and order of the Prescribed Authority, Vth A. D. J. , Moradabad on 18-10-1985 dismissed the appeal hence this writ petition.

(2.) IN the rejoinder-affidavit as well as in the application dated 16-5-2005 supported by the supplementary-affidavit of petitioner No. 1 it was stated that during pendency of the writ petition the shop in dispute had completely fallen down. On 9-3-2005 learned Counsel for tenant-respondents was allowed four weeks time to verify condition of the building from his client. Thereafter on 8-8-2005, learned Counsel for the respondent was granted three weeks' time to file affidavit in respect of condition of building with the rider that if no affidavit/counter-affidavit was filed the allegation of the landlord might be taken to be correct. No counter-affidavit to the affidavit of landlord has been filed.

(3.) ACCORDINGLY, writ petition is allowed. Both the impugned orders are set aside. Building stands released in favour of the landlords. In the affidavit filed in support of application dated 16-5-2005, it was also stated in para 5 that the tenant had permanently shifted to Bombay. In view of this there is no need to initiate separate proceedings under Section 23 of the Act for taking possession. The possession of the shop in dispute in whatever condition it may be today stands delivered in favour of the landlords through this judgment. Landlords are directed to positively re-construct the shop within six months from today. Tenant is entitled to apply for taking possession of the newly constructed shop under Section 24 of the Act immediately after its re-construction. In case shop is not reconstructed within six months from today landlord-petitioners would be liable to pay damages of Rs. 25,000 to the tenant-respondent which may be recovered through application filed before prescribed authority concerned. Petition disposed of. .