KEDAR NATH PANDEY Vs. CHIEF REVENUE OFFICER BASTI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. U. Khan, J. This writ petition was dismissed by me on 12-8- 2004 against which S. L. P. No. 24116 of 2004 was filed before Supreme Court. The Supreme Court on 3-12-2004 dismissed the said S. L. P. as withdrawn by following order : "after arguing for some time, the learned Counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the special leave petition stating that no written consent was taken by the contesting respondent as required under Section 196 of the Agra Tenancy Act. Though this point was urged but it has not been considered and the petitioner wants to move the High Court in review on this point. Under the circumstances, the special leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn. "

(2.) THEREAFTER this review petition has been filed alongwith delay condonation application.

(3.) CALCUTTA High Court in Smt. B. Dass v. C. M. C. , reported in AIR 2005 N. O. C. 223 (CALCUTTA), has held that rigid principles of review contained in the aforesaid provisions of CPC do not apply to review in writ petitions.