LAWS(ALL)-2005-3-321

VIKRANT TYRES LIMITED Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Decided On March 24, 2005
VIKRANT TYRES LIMITED Appellant
V/S
STATE OF U.P. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ALL Respondents are represented through Standing Counsel and that the arguments raised at the Bar require no enquiry on facts, we proceed to decide writ petition finally, without calling for Counter and Rejoinder Affidavits, at admission stage as contemplated under Chapter XXII Rule -2 Rules of Court.

(2.) THESE writ petitions relate to three assessment years, as follows:

(3.) THE three writ petitions based on similar facts, raise common question of law and hence decided together by common judgment."