MAHRAJI Vs. DY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION JAUNPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. U. Khan, J. According to Sheo Baran respondent No. 2 (since deceased and survived by legal representatives), he and original petitioners were related to each other through the following pedigree: Shiv Dutt Bali Baliraj Sukhraj Ram Dular Tukuroo Shiv Baran (Petitioner No. 2) (Respondent No. 2) Smt. Maharaji (petitioner No. 1)

(2.) ACCORDING to petitioners, Shiv Dutt had only two sons Bali and Baliraj. Sukhraj was not son of Shiv Dutt.

(3.) THE claim of respondent No. 2 is liable to be dismissed only on the ground that he could not proved that he was grandson of Shiv Dutt.