BHARAT LAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) B. S. Chauhan, J. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the impugned suspension order dated 17-2-2005 (Annex. 1) passed by the respondent No. 2.

(2.) THE facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that the petitioner, an Executive Engineer in Construction Division (Maintenance), U. P. Jal Nigam, had been working as the Executive Engineer in the respondent-Department. THEre had been a direction at district level to repair the hand pumps at the instance of Members of Parliament as well as Members of Legislative Assembly. THE spare parts for repairing the hand pumps had been purchased at local level. However, on the allegations of irregularity, illegality, financial loss to the Department in purchasing the material in contravention of the order issued by the Head Office, and maligning the image of the Department against the petitioner, the impugned suspension order has been passed.

(3.) WE have considered the rival submissions made by learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record.