ARSHAD JAMIL Vs. STATE OF UTTARANCHAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAJESH Tandon, J. Heard Sri Sudhanshu Dhulia, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri D. S. Patni, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sharad Sharma, counsel for the re spondent no. 2 and Standing Counsel for the respondents no. 1, 3, 4 and 5.

(2.) BY the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 18-12-2004 passed by respondent no. 1 ter minating the services of the petitioner as Civil Judge (J. D. ). Petitioner has, fur ther, prayed for a writ of mandamus di recting the respondents to allow the pe titioner to work on the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) and pay him salary regularly.

(3.) PURSUANT to the said appoint ment order, a notification dated 18-9-2003 was issued by High Court of Uttaranchal posting the petitioner as Civil Judge (Junior Division) in the vacant Court at Purola, Uttarkashi.