SAHEENA BANO Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A. Mateen, J. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate.

(2.) THE present petition under Section 482 Cr. P. C. has been preferred against order dated 28-10-2004 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow in Misc. Case No. 775 of 2004 by means of which the learned Magistrate has rejected the application moved by the petitioner under Section 156 (3) Cr. P. C. and also against revisional order dated 18-2-2005 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Lucknow (Court No. 10) in Criminal Revision No. 340 of 2004.

(3.) IN view of my observations made above, order dated 28-10-2004 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow and order dated 18-2-2005 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Lucknow (Court No. 10) are hereby set aside. The Magistrate concerned is directed to ensure that F. I. R. on the basis of the application under Section 156 (3) Cr. P. C. moved by the petitioner is registered at the police station concerned within a week from the date of production of a certified copy of the order and investigation is conducted expeditiously.