RADHEY SHAYAM YADAV Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAVINDRA Singh, J. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Ray, learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned A. G. A.

(2.) THIS writ petition is filed on behalf of Radhey Shyam Yadav with a prayer that respondents be directed to release the Vehicle No. U. P. 60-A 0919 (Jeep) in favour of the petitioner.

(3.) IT is further contended that the vehicle in question was never used as a public vehicle. IT is used as a private vehicle and respondent No. 2 has submitted challan report after six months of the seizure of the petitioner's vehicle, which is a concocted document and the conduct of respondent No. 2 was fully malafide. In case there was any violation of the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, the petitioner was liable for fine only.