RAM KISHAN Vs. TRILOK CHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) VINEET Saran, J. Plaintiff-Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 filed suit No. 259 of 1995 before Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ghaziabad on 28-2-1995 praying for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the respondent No. 7, Nagar Palika Dadri as well as Respondent No. 6, Nagar Parishad Karmchari Mahasangh, Dadri from taking possession over the land in dispute and not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the plaintiffs over the said property.

(2.) THE dispute arose when on 5-2-1995 a foundation stone was laid by the then M. L. A. of the area inaugurating Nagar Parishad Karmchari Avas Colony over 2 Bighas of land which the plaintiffs- respondents No. 1 to 5 claim that they had purchased on 16-5-1983 from its owner Jeevan Lal, in whose favour the land was duly recorded by the order of the competent authority (Deputy Director of Consolidation) passed on 7-6-1961. An ex parte injunction order was granted in favour of the Plaintiff- respondent Nos. 1 to 5, which was thereafter confirmed on 16-5-1995. However, against the said injunction order the respondents No. 6 and 7, filed Misc. Appeal No. 100 of 1995 which was allowed on 6-3-1997 and the order dated 16-5-1995 was set aside. Aggrieved by the same the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 filed writ petition No. 9567 of 1997 before this Hon'ble Court which was disposed of on 7-5-1997 with the direction that the constructions, if any, made by the respondents No. 6 and 7 shall be at their own risk and subject to the decision of the suit. Since certain constructions had been made on the plot in dispute, the plaintiff-respondent Nos. 1 to 5 got their plaint amended and added the prayer for demolition of the constructions raised by the respondents No. 6 and 7 and to restore the land in its original condition at the cost of the said parties. After the said amendment had been allowed, the respondents No. 6 and 7 filed a joint written statement on 18-9-1997 in which it was claimed that the land belonged to the Land Management Committee, Dadri and thereafter vested in the respondent No. 7, Nagar Palika Dadri and had been allotted to its employees vide resolution dated 5-12-1991. On 21-1- 1998 the issue No. 7 regarding non joinder of parties (individual members of the Association who had been allotted the plots) had been decided in favour of the plaintiffs-respondents No. 1 to 5 on the ground that the employee's association (whose members had been allotted the land), was already a party. On 13-9-2002 the hearing of suit No. 259 of 1995 was concluded and 24-9-2002 was fixed for delivery of the judgment. However, on 24-9-2002 the case was again fixed for re-hearing on certain issues.

(3.) THE petitioners claim themselves to be the allottees of the plots of land by Nagar Palika, Dadri. In the suit, Nagar Parishad Karmchari Mahasangh Dadri, of which all the petitioners are members, had been impleaded as a defendant along with Nagar Palika, Dadri. It is not the case of the petitioners that they were not members of the said Mahasangh. THE trial Court has thus rejected the application of the petitioners on the ground that since the petitioners were members of the said Mahasangh, which was a defendant in the suit, their cause was being spoused by the said Mahasangh. THEre is no denial in the writ petition by the petitioners that they are not the members of the said Mahasangh. THE other ground on which the application has been rejected by the trial Court is that earlier vide order dated 21-1-1998 Issue No. 7 with regard to non-joinder of parties in the suit, had been decided, which was challenged by the Nagar Parishad Karmachari Mahasangh by filing Civil Revision No. 58 of 1998 which is pending before this Court, in which no interim order has been granted. On this ground also the trial Court rejected the application stating that the matter has already been once decided by the trial Court and the same cannot be re-agitated again.