YASH PAL SINGH Vs. BALA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) APPLICATION dated 8-4-2005 was considered today. This application was filed against the order dated 27-12-2004 passed by the Addl. Commissioner staying the order of SDM on 2-11-2004.

(2.) A perusal of the file reveals that there has been a comedy of errors in this case. The SDMs order could not have been considered by the Addl. Commissioner as he had no jurisdiction and Addl. Commissioners order dated 27-12-2004 could not be challenged on a revision as the order of Addl. Commissioner was an interlocutory order. It would not be appropriate for this Court to pass a judgment on an order which was in itself bad in law as the said Court did not have a jurisdiction. The revisionist should move an application in the Court of Addl. Commissioner to review the decision.