MANOHAR LAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAKESH Tiwari, J. Heard Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

(2.) THE petitioner has filed this writ petition for quashing the order passed by the Commissioner (Administration), Bareilly dated 1-11-99 and the order of the District Magistrate, Pilibhit dated 26-8-98 cancelling the fisheries lease granted to the petitioner on 20-7-96 in exercise of power under Section 198 (4) of U. P. Z. A. & L. R. Act.

(3.) THE contention of the respondents is that the lease was granted in favour of three persons, namely Sarva Sri Tula Ram, Janki Prasad and the petitioner. Sri Tula Ram and Janki Prasad did not challenge the order of cancellation of lease before the Commissioner and have also not been impleaded as respondents in this writ petition, hence petition is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties.