SHYAM LAL Vs. VISHNU DUTT SHARMA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ANJANI Kumar, J. The petitioner-tenant aggrieved by the order passed by the prescribed authority under the provisions of the U. P. Act No. XIII of 1972, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', dated 18th May, 2005, approached this Court by means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, copy whereof is annexed as Annexure '4' to the writ petition.

(2.) THE brief facts of the present case are that the petitioner, during the pendency of the proceedings under Section 21 (1) (a) of the Act before the prescribed authority after the case was fixed for final hearing, has filed an application seeking amendment in his written statement. This application of the petitioner has been rejected by the prescribed authority by the order impugned in the present writ petition, thus this writ petition.

(3.) I have given my considered thoughts to the arguments advanced on behalf of the petitioner and I found that the order passed by the prescribed authority impugned in the present writ petition does not suffer from any error, much less error apparent on the face of record, so as to warrant any interference by this Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.