KAMAL KRISHNA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) JUDGMENT M.K. Mittal, J. The application has been filed by the applicant under Section 482 Cr. P.C. with the prayer to quash the order dated 8 -7 -2005 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No. 5, Saharanpur in Criminal Revision No. 16 of 2005 and with a further prayer to stay the operation of the impugned order.

(2.) I have heard learned Counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A and perused the record.

(3.) AFTER about one year of the marriage, when the complainant came to his house from his duty he found Tajendra and his wife in objectionable position and he turned Tajendra out of his house and asked him never to come to his house. He also stated that he would lodge a report against Tejendra. At this Tajendra threatened to teach him a lesson. In the circumstances, he was compelled to file a divorce suit on 11 -5 -2004.