ARCHANA GOEL Vs. DISTRICT JUDGE ALLAHABAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE two writ petitions since raise common question of facts and law, therefore, they are together and decided by common judgment with the consent of the parties.

(2.) IT is not disputed that the petitioners filed two writ petitions before this Court, one being Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 19187 of 2004; Archana Goel v. The Additional District Judge, Allahabad and Anr. and second being Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 19215 of 2004; Suresh Chandra Goel v. The Additional District Judge, Allahabad and Anr. The facts giving rise to these writ petitions are as under:

(3.) AFTER this Court dismissed the aforesaid two writ petitions, as stated above, the petitioners did not furnish undertaking, nor they handed over the possession, as directed by this Court by its judgment and order dated 9 -7 -2004. The petitioners took up the case to the Supreme Court by Special Leave Petition wherein by the order dated 16 -11 -2004 Hon'ble Supreme Court has been pleased to pass the following order: