BAIJ NATH BHATTACHARYA Vs. LABOUR COURT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) The petitioner--workman, employed with the respondent No.2 has raised an industrial dispute regarding alleged wrongful termination of his service w.e.f. August 31, 1981. The State of U.P. in exercise of its powers under Section 4-K of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the said dispute for adjudication to the Labour Court, Allahabad vide order dated June 30, 1982. The Respondent No. 1 gave its award on May 30, 1985 and reference was answered against the petitioner. This award was published on August 20, 1985. This award has been questioned by the petitioner in this writ petition. The petitioner has questioned the legality of the order of termination of his service on the ground that the Respondent No.2 has not given him one month notice or notice-pay and retrenchment compensation and hence same has been made in total violation of the provisions of Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the 'State Act'). The Respondent No. 1 decided and answered the reference against the petitioner on two grounds, namely that the petitioner has not actually worked for 240 days and secondly he did not remain in employment of the Respondent No. 2 for 12 calendar months. Though admittedly the petitioner has been paid wages of Sundays and holidays but the Labour Court did not count paid holidays for the calculation of total days of working of the petitioner in this case.

(3.) The petitioner was appointed on September 22, 1980 and his services were terminated on August 31, 1981. From this fact it comes out that the petitioner has not worked during a period of twelve calendar months. Section 6-N of the State Act reads as under :