RAJEAY BHARTI Vs. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AGRA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) R. B. Mehrotra, J. By means of the present Habeas Corpus Petition, the petitioner, namly, Rajeev Bharti has challenged the detention order passed against by the District Magistrate, Aligarn on 29th of June, 1994 directing detention of the petitioner under Section 3 (2) of the National Security Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and also challenging the continuance of his detention in pursuance of the aforesaid order.

(2.) THE petitioner has contended many grounds in support of his writ petition but since we are satisfied that the present petition can be allowed on a short ground, we are not referring to all the grounds and suomissions made by the petitioner's counsel.

(3.) THE grounds of detention served on the petitioner also do not men tion that if the petitioner comes out of jail, he is likely to indulge himself in some activities which are likely to disturb the public order. fcithe grounds only say that if the petitioner comes out of jail it is likely to result in disturbance of public order and may create disturbance in maintenance of public peace. THE petitioner cannot be blamed for such a situation.