LILADHAR Vs. ASSTT COLLECTOR SHAHJAHANPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PARITOSH K. Mukherjee, J. Although this miscellaneous writ petition is appearing for admission after 6 years since 1988 as no direction was passed earlier by learned judge concerned at the time of moving of the petition on July 5, 1988, but, by the consent of the learned counsel for the parties the writ petition i taken for final hearing and disposal.

(2.) PETITIONER is aggrieved by an order dated 4-4-1988 passed by the respondent No. 2, dismissing his review application.

(3.) THIS Court is of the view that since there is no express power of review in the statute, it will be difficult for the revisional authority, functioning by discharging judicial function, unless this power is treated to be inherited with the concerned authority.