(1.) D. S. Sinha, J. Adhering to the well established and known practice of the Court, on Tuesday the 25th October, 1994 unlisted miscellaneous applications were taken up at 12 O'clock and disposed of by 12. 25 p. m. Some applications were rejected as there was no counsel or party present to press them. In two such applications Shri Murlidhar Mishra, Advocate was counsel for the applicant.
(2.) SOON after the Court resumed consideration of left over fresh petitions in seriatim, Shri Mishra appeared in court and, without seeking usual permission and in a very agitated manner, started making complaints about rejection of his applications.
(3.) SHRI Misra had completely lost his balance at that time. He wilfully and deliberately behaved contemptuously and obstructed the court from transacting its judi cial business. In deed, such a situation was created that court was compelled to rise without being able to transact any other judicial business that day.