KAILASH PRASAD JAISWAL Vs. NAGAR PALIKA MAHRAJGANJ

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for appellant. Refusal of temporary injunction is the grievance of the appellant in this appeal.

(2.) IN respect of the Taxi Stand of Nagarpalika, appellant was given permission to manage subject to payment by him amounts as stipulated in written agreement. There is a clause in the written agreement that such permission can be renewed on terms as stipulated in the agreement. After the period of permission expired, appellant wanted renewal. INstead of renew ing the permission, the same was put to auction. Appellant took part in the auction. Since he could not become highest bidder, he filed the suit in effect to enforce renewal clause in the agreement. Along with the plaint, he filed application for temporary injunction which having been refused, this appeal has been filed.

(3.) IN result, there is no merit in this appeal which is dismissed in limine under Order XLI, Rule 11, C. P. C. Appeal dismissed. .