RADHA CHARAN Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE cause list shows this case for admission. However, Sri S. K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, and. learned Standing Counsel have argued the case, on meats, and with their consent, the writ petition is being finally decided, in accordance with Rules of the Court,

(2.) THE facts of the case, in (brief, are that a notice under Section 10 (2) of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act. (hereinafter referred to as "the Act') was served on the petitioner in 1975 which was in respect of land which was declared as 'surplus" by Prescribed Authority. THEreafter, a second notice was again issued on 22 10-1975 in respect of the same land. On the earlier occasion, Prescribed Authority bad declared 9.02 acres of land as 'surplus' but in the second notice, it was proposed to be raised to 26 97 acres.

(3.) AGAINST aforesaid judgment and order, the petitioner came before this Court by means of Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 925 of 1977. which was partly allowed by Honourable Mr. Justice M. B. Farooqui on 8-11-1978 and the case was sent back to the lower appellate court for decision afresh.