SUDHIR KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE attempt here is by an adhoc employee to block the appointment of a regularly selected candidate on the plea that other adhoc employees, similary situated, had moved this Court earlier and obtained Stay Orders by virtue of which they continue in service. Reference here being t6 the interim orders passed on April 27, 1991 in Civil Writ Petition 24990 of 1991 (Rajnesh Pandey v. State of U. P. and another) and on August 2. 1991 in Civil Writ Petition 28842 of 1991 (Vipul Kumar Upadhyay v. State of U. P. and another) Annexure X & XI.

(2.) A mere interim order passed in a pending writ petition cannot be construed as a binding judicial precedent in the final hearing of the matter, as in the present ease.

(3.) THIS writ petition is with these observations hereby dismissed. 6 After this order had been passed, Counsel for the petitioner prayed that he may be permitted to have this writ petition dismissed as not pressed. Ordered accordingly. Petition dismissed.