JAGDISH NARAIN Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) R. K. Agrawal, J. The only point involved in this revisions is whether the learned Sessions Judge, Hardoi was justified in summoning the revisionist under Section 319 Cr. P. Con the basis of examination-in-chief of the witness, Hari Niwas P. W. 1 without recording entire statement.

(2.) HEARD, learned Counsel for the parties. Learned Counsel for the parties agree that the revision may be disposed of finally.

(3.) THE revision is allowed. THE order dated 5-5-1994, passed by the learned Sessions Judge in S. T No. 212 of 1993 is set aside. THE learned Sessions Judge would get the complete statement of Hari Niwas and there after if it is necessary he may exercise power under Section 319 Cr. P. C. and may decide to summon the revisionist in the case. Revision allowed. .