SURAJ PRAKASH BHATIA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD counsel for the parties.

(2.) SINCE the counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged, in view of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952, the present petition is being disposed of finally at the stage of admission.

(3.) IT is averred that after filing of the counter affidavit the petitioner having come to know that an order has been passed by respondents on the 21st of March, 1991, the petitioner amended the petition by adding relief of quashing this order and adding grounds below, which was allowed by means of a separate order. The respondents have not annexed the order dated the 21st of March, 1991, along, with the counter affidavit, though it has been averred in the counter affidavit ITself. We find this order has been annexed as annexure along with an affidavit filed by the petitioner while filing his application dated the 21st of December, 1993.