DESHPAT SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BINOD Kumar Roy, J. In terms of the order dated 2. 8. 1989, I propose to dispose of this writ application at the admission stage itself.

(2.) THE petitioners Deshpat Singh son of Deokinandan and Jahar Singh son of Deshpat Singh pray to quash the order dated 30. 8:1986 passed by the Prescribed Authority Ceiling (Additional Sub- Divisional Officer), Lalitpur (Respondent No. 3) in Ceiling Case No. 1/8 of 1985-86- State v. Deshpat Singh as contained in Annexure-5, declaring 21. 76 acres of lands as surplus of petitioner No. 1 and the Appellate Order dated 12. 7. 1989 passed by the Additional Com missioner, Jhansi Division, Jhansi (Respondent No. 2) dismissing their Appeal No. 1/1/2 of 1988-89, as contained in Annexure-6.

(3.) SHRI S. C. Mamgian, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, on the other hand contended that the authorities have correctly recorded their findings and held petitioner No. 2 to be minor having born after abolition of zamindari and not entitled for any unit. My finding :