LAWS(ALL)-1984-8-79

ABDUL WAHAB Vs. CHANDRA PRAKASH

Decided On August 23, 1984
ABDUL WAHAB Appellant
V/S
CHANDRA PRAKASH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is an appeal under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, directed against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kanpur, dated May 10, 1977.

(2.) ABDUL Naqi, son of Abdul Wahab, aged about 2 years, was at pay on the foot-path opposite the premises No. 25/39, Karachi Khana, Kanpur on August 14, 1975 at about 5.40 P.M. The father Abdul Wahab was at work in cycle repairing close by Car No. UPG 5073, belonging to respondent No. 1. was standing at a distance of merely 20 paces from the child. Driver Arif, respondent No. 2, was at the steering. He gave a start to the car and proceeded from south towards north overrunning the child. Abdul Naqi sustained mutiple injuries; he was rushed to hospital, but be succumbed to the injuries within about two hours. First Information Report was lodged by Abdul Wahab at 8.45 p. m. the same day. On November 20, 1975, Abdul Wahab and his wife applied for the award of compensation contending that the accident occurred on account of the rash and negligent driving by the respondent No. 2. The claim was resisted by the respondents pleading that at the relevant time the car was out of order and the respondent No. 2 did not drive the same. It was also averred that the deceased was not in a position to support the parents and the claim laid for compensation is imaginary.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the appellants urged that upon the material placed on the record as found also by the Tribunal, it is clearly made out that the respondent No. 2 was rash and negligent in driving the car. P.W. Abdul Wahab, the father was at work about four or five paces away from the child, He is an eye-witness to the accident and nothing could be elicited in cross-examination to discard his testimony on the point. P.W. A.K. Pandey, was on the road over his motor cycle at a short distance.