ROSHAN SINGH Vs. BOARD OF REVENUE U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ petition arises out of proceedings under Section 122-B of the UP ZA and LR Act. The petitioners have been ordered to be evicted from the disputed land and have been held liable to pay damages as is evident from the judgment of the Tahsildar Assistant Collector 1st Class, Mathura dated 10-9-1973. Against the order of the Trial Court the petitioner preferred a revision petition which was recommended to be allowed by the Additional Commissioner through his order dated 16-1-75. The revisional court through its order dated 15-2-1977 has rejected the revision petition and has confirmed the order of the trial court.

(2.) THE learned counsel for the petitioner has contended before me that the learned member has patently erred in making the following observation in paragraph 14 of his judgment :-

(3.) IN the result the writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. There would be no order as to costs. Petition dismissed.